edtna-erca-conference2012.com » Author's Information » Manuscript Scholarship

Manuscript Scholarship

There are three scholarships to be awarded as follows:

First Prize - Best Manuscript Scholarship (500 Euro for the winner)
Second Prize - Best Manuscript Scholarship (Certificate of merit)
Third Prize - Best Manuscript Scholarship (Certificate of merit)

All award prize winners will receive a certificate of merit. The manuscript scholarships are prestigious awards for EDTNA/ERCA given to members for the papers which best exemplify the overall aims of the Association – to spread awareness of new, well researched work which develops and improves the knowledge base of our membership, enabling them to review their own practice and their care of Renal patients.

The closing date for the receipt of the manuscript to the EDTNA/ERCA Conference Department is 22 July 2012.

Sending the manuscript to the CONFERENCE DEPARTMENT

The manuscript must be written as a WORD document (MS Word 2003/2007/2010). No other method of submission is permitted. It should be sent as an email attachment together with Application form to Monika FIALOVA from the Conference Department - Abstracts2012@edtnaerca.org.

Rules for presentation of manuscript

Length of manuscript:	3,000 words maximum (excluding references)
Language:	English
Type script:	Arial or Times New Roman
Font size:	12

Order of presentation

Title of paper (without name of author)
Insert your abstract presentation type and number (O11 or P023 for example)
Main text
List of references
Pages must be numbered
Work must be truly original and your own
The work must not have been accepted for publication prior to being presented at the conference
Any manuscript containing statistics will be reviewed by the EDTNA/ERCA professional statisticians
You have to be present at the Conference to receive your Scholarship award

Publication of Manuscript

Please Note: Separate to the manuscript scholarship award, all manuscripts may also be submitted to the Journal of Renal Care by the author with a view to publication. However each manuscript as all those submitted to the Journal will be subjected to peer review before acceptance (see JORC Author and Submission Guidelines).

Written Manuscript Marking Criteria
(Manuscript Scholarship Award)

The manuscripts are judged on the following criteria:

1. Study design

Is the design of the study sufficiently described?
Was the design of the study appropriate to the objective?
Was the sample appropriate with regard to the population to which the findings will be relevant?
Is the design of the study acceptable?

2. Analysis of statistics if used

Were the statistical methods used appropriate for the data?
Are the conclusions drawn from the statistical analyses justified?
Is the paper statistically acceptable?

3. Contribution to Renal care

Does the manuscript contain knowledge that will enhance the care of the person with renal failure? This may relate to your country specifically or on a European level

4. Originality of findings and implications for practice (these are more important than the originality of topic)

New findings and new outcomes
Application to practice
Implications for changes in practice which arise from you work

5. Comprehension

Even if you are writing about a complicated subject your manuscript must be understood by others who may not be experts in the field
You should use plain language and good English. If English is not your native language find someone to check the manuscript for you
You will not be penalised for your standard of English but it does have to be clear and read well

6. Objectivity with critical evaluation

This manuscript will demonstrate your ability to professionally evaluate the subject you are writing about, with reference to other work done in the area
Using references you can offer proof of the relevance of your work

7. References

References (between 8-15 refs) show you have read about your subject and show proof of other work to substantiate your own findings.
Please use references as shown below in the modified Harvard style: In the text the authors' names should be cited followed by the date of publication, e.g. Ormandy (2008). If two or more works have the same originator and year, lower-case letters given after the year distinguishes them. Where there are three or more authors, the first author's name followed by et al. should be written in the text, e.g. Sutton et al. (2008).

Ormandy P. (2008) Information topics important to chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review, Journal of Renal Care 34(1), 1-9.
Sutton D., Hollingdale R., Hart K. (2008) Questionnaire to evaluate and elucidate patients perceptions of renal dietary advice, Journal of Renal Care 34(3), 143-150.

8. Overall quality of work

This means the whole presentation, which complies with the recommended format, should be a pleasure to read.

If any of the above guidelines are not complied with the manuscript will not be considered eligible for the manuscript scholarship

Tables and photos are permitted but ensure appropriate copyright
Demonstrate your method of research and results and ensure that your statistics are appropriate and correctly used
Make sure the statistics answer the questions
Concentrate on the outcomes and implications for practice

Documents Download

Click the file name (or PDF icon) bellow to open the PDF file in your browser.
Right-click and select 'Save target as...' to save the file to your computer.

Manuscript application form	15301_EE 2012 - APPLICATION FORM MANUSCRIPT.pdf		196.086 kB
Guidelines for writing manuscripts	8922_EE 2012 - GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS.pdf		319.458 kB

2013 CONFERENCE Malmö, Sweden